In Vivo Glenoid Loads - Measured with Instrumented Implants in 6 Patients
ثبت نشده
چکیده
INTRODUCTION Realistic loads acting in the shoulder joint are essential for improving implant design and testing. Additionally this data can be used to advise patients and medical staff which motions can be performed in the rehabilitation process, and which should be avoided short time post operative. So far, joint loads were estimated using computer models or cadaver experiments with strongly varying results depending on the author and used model. Recently an instrumented shoulder implant was developed, capable of measuring 3D forces and moments acting on the humerus [1]. However, most critical in shoulder arthroplasty is still the glenoid component, including the “rocking horse phenomenon”. An eccentric load on the glenoid, leading to implant loosening and increased wear, causes this. This phenomenon is also included in mechanical testing of glenoid implants [2]. However, the direction of the eccentricity of the shoulder load is unknown so far. Models calculated eccentricities for abduction motion [3,4], while most activities of daily living are connected with elevation in the sagittal plane Using synchronous in vivo load measurement and motion capture with scapula tracking, the loads of the humerus can be transferred to the glenoid. Still, the eccentricity of the acting force cannot be measured directly. However, in a simplified model described by [5], the combination of the resultant force FG and the bending moments MX and MY acting in the glenoid plane can be a hint of an eccentric force shift. In this model positive values for MX and MY indicate a force shift to anterior-inferior and negative values a shift to posterior-superior, respectively (Fig.1, top left). Many activities of daily living involve an elevation of the arm in the sagittal plane. Therefore we analyzed this motion as far as the patients were capable to do it.
منابع مشابه
Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?
Background: The projected increase in revision shoulder arthroplasty has increased interest in the outcomes of theseprocedures. Glenoid component removal and conversion to a hemiarthroplasty (HA) is an option for aseptic glenoidloosening after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA).Methods: We identified patients who had undergone revision shoulder arthroplasty over a 15-...
متن کاملStandardized Loads Acting in Hip Implants
With the increasing success of hip joint replacements, the average age of patients has decreased, patients have become more active and their expectations of the implant durability have risen. Thus, pre-clinical endurance tests on hip implants require defining realistic in vivo loads from younger and more active patients. These loads require simplifications to be applicable for simulator tests a...
متن کاملThe Dimensions of the Scapula Glenoid in Japanese Rotator Cuff Tear Patients
BACKGROUND Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has become a widely accepted surgical procedure in Japan since the time when the implants were approved for use in 2014. There is a doubt, however, as to whether the implants designed for Western people are suitable for Japanese people, particularly for females of relatively small stature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the glenoid di...
متن کاملDetermination of prevalence of glenoid bony lesions after recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation using the 3-D CT scan
Background : Glenoid bone damages consisting of anterior rim erosion and bony avulsion are very important in decision making for treatment of recurrent dislocation in shoulder joint. This study was aimed to determine the prevalence of these damages in patients with anterior recurrent shoulder dislocation. Methods : The study was a cross-sectional study evaluating patients with unstable shou...
متن کاملComparison of Asymmetric Reaming versus a Posteriorly Augmented Component for Posterior Glenoid Wear and Retroversion: A Radiographic Study
Background: Managing posterior glenoid wear and retroversion remains a challenge in shoulder arthroplasty.Correcting glenoid version through asymmetric reaming (AR) with placement of a standard glenoid component and theuse of posteriorly augmented glenoid (PAG) components are two methods used to address this problem. Our objectiveis to report the radiographic outcomes of patie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013